If permitted under existing laws, which action would effectively cease the operation of an establishment?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Prepare for the NEHA REHS/RS Exam with interactive flashcards and multiple choice questions. Each question provides hints and explanations to help you succeed. Get exam-ready now!

Revoking a license is the action that would effectively cease the operation of an establishment because it removes the legal permission required to conduct business. In many jurisdictions, establishments such as restaurants, retail stores, or manufacturing facilities must hold specific licenses to operate legally. When a license is revoked, the establishment no longer meets the legal requirements to function, thus halting all operations.

The process of revocation typically involves a review or violation of established codes or regulations, which means that after the revocation, it is unlawful for the establishment to continue its operations until the issues are resolved or a new license is issued. This action serves as a direct and formal mechanism to enforce compliance with health and safety standards, ensuring that the establishment adheres to the required regulations.

In contrast, a mandatory injunction and a general injunction are legal orders that may require or prohibit certain actions but do not directly strip an establishment of its ability to operate. Lawmakers refer to the legislative body that creates laws but do not take immediate action to cease operations of specific establishments. Therefore, revoking a license is the most effective means of immediately ceasing operations.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy