From a legal standpoint, which standard is easier to enforce?

The specification-type standard is easier to enforce because it provides clear and specific criteria or requirements that must be met. These standards outline exact specifications for materials, processes, or performance outcomes, leaving little room for interpretation. As a result, compliance can be more readily assessed through objective measurements.

When a regulation is based on specifications, it becomes straightforward to determine whether an entity meets the requirements or not. Inspectors and enforcers can easily measure if the specific criteria are being adhered to, making the enforcement process more efficient and effective. This clarity in expectations helps ensure consistent application and understanding among stakeholders including businesses, regulatory authorities, and the public.

In contrast, other types of standards, such as performance standards, may require a more subjective assessment of whether an outcome has been achieved, which can complicate enforcement. Federal and state standards can vary in their specificity and practical application, which might also affect their enforceability.